Avoiding Spiritual Treason

DLSIn an address at a conference on social reconstruction, Dorothy Sayers had these strong words (among others) to say about the state of the church and its relationship to the culture:

If the Church is to find her common soul, she must contrive to root it in a common integrity. I do not mean that she must be uninterested in the social, political and moral sphere of the Law, but that she must be disinterested…But I find in the Church as a whole very little reverence for intellectual integrity…For the general tendency today, among the rank and file of Christendom, is to a religion divorced from theology–a religion that is in denial of the divinity of the Word. (Dorothy Sayers: Her Life & Soul, Barbara Reynolds)

Uninterested…disinterested….is this a distinction without a difference? I think Sayers point is that Christians will always have an interested in the governance of the society in which they live, but that there should be a greater emphasis on the work that the church has been called to–teach Christianity–and to work hard very hard at it. I think she believed that a great deal of what goes on the secular realm has an opportunity to work itself out if the people who are members of God’s Kingdom are equipped to work out the implications of their own worldview each day. What good is it, she seems to suggest, to take a strong interest in the legal and moral structure of a culture if the Church is failing in its mission to teach Christianity and to maintain its commitment to the authority of scripture? She gives us a great deal to consider.

Like any other theologian in any other time in history, Sayers doesn’t get everything right. But there is wisdom to be received from this reluctant prophet of her time. I began in November of 2012 to take another look at the nature of Christian involvement in society and how we engage fully in the political cycles. Our expectations are out of balance with our influence. Our compromises fit well with our understanding of our own beliefs–we don’t know what we believe.

In this same address, Dorothy went on to say,

The Kingdom of Heaven is not of this world; and the attempt to yoke it to any form of secular constitution is treason…If…the Church commits herself…to the support of any particular form of political government…she will find herself insensibly adopting and maintaining…its underlying assumptions, which may be very strongly in conflict with her theology.

The Triumph of Easter

That evil could exist, and to some be increasing in intensity, is a conflict for those who struggle with the idea of God. As the argument goes, how could a benevolent God exist when so much evil prevails in the world. How can this God of Christianity sit back and watch humanity suffer? Isn’t this truly a merciless God?

The problem is evil is not satisfactorily resolved for those with utopian expectations for the here and now. Dorothy Sayers eloquently shows the expectations of the disciples wasn’t all that different from those who struggle with the paradox of good and evil today.

Now, indeed, they could go out and “do something” about the problem of sin and suffering. They had seen the strong hands of God twist the crown of thorns into a crown of glory, and in hands as strong a that they knew themselves safe. They had misunderstood practically everything Christ had ever said to them, but no matter: the thing made sense at last, and the meaning was far beyond anything they had dreamed. The had expected a walkover, and they beheld a victory; they had expected an earthly Messiah, and they beheld the Soul of Eternity ~ The Triumph of Easter

What was it that the disciples were to do about the problem of evil? They weren’t going to eliminate it. They weren’t going to pretend it doesn’t exist. But the triumph of the Cross was the heart of the “something” they could do. To “go out and do something” is the same thing that each of us is called to do, to preach Christ and the Cross, explaining why death and desolation have been defeated by the Suffering Servant. And this was no accident, no wishful thinking that circumstances would work out this way in order to provide a pathway for justice and mercy. Chance bows at the throne of the Sovereign.

Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst…this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. God raised him up, loosing the pangs of of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it. (Acts 2:22-24)


But He takes our sins and errors and turns them into victories, as He made the crime of the Crucifixion to be the salvation of the world. O felix culpa! ~Dorothy Sayers

True Love and the Culture Wars

make-disciples-textBeing a follower of Jesus seems like an easy enough way to live. How difficult is it, for example, to obey the Great Commandment and simply love your neighbor as yourself? We know the answer to that. Fortunately, a life devoted to Christ and his mission does not find its foundation in expressions of mere sentimentality. If it did, love would be more accurately defined as impatient and inhumane because feelings are remarkably undependable. If you doubt this, consider your own experiences with the difficult people with which God has blessed your life. A prerequisite for fulfilling our part of 1 Corinthians 13, “the love chapter,” is in knowing that love transcends our fleeting emotions. When ripped away from the command to love God with our entire being, the command to love our neighbor loses its significance.

The feeling of love, whatever that is, does not consistently challenge us to pay proper attention to the less-than-pleasant members of our families, the cranky neighbors that would rather you live in another town, the bloggers that trample inerrancy or the talk show hosts that know little of that which they try to defend. A commitment to love even our enemies is necessary to prophetically engage our world with kindness and a gospel-driven generosity. Love enacted upon in real time—not just contemplated within our minds—is an aspect of being conformed to the image of Christ. It means actively extinguishing the urge to revert to the ways of the sinful man or woman we were before our lives were transformed by the gospel, before we knew the love of God. It requires us to demonstrate the love of Christ even to those with which we disagree in the midst of the culture wars. I’m pretty sure we’re called to err on the side of gentleness and respect. Continue reading